Casablanca: Baghdad: Kathmandu: Rangoon: Bogota:
 
Join the Newsletter List
Name:
Email:

 

Subscribe

Unsubscribe

Subscribe to our e-newsletter for updates from Polo's Bastards - border crossing, hot-spots, travel warnings etc.

 

Home

About Us

Forum

Reviews

Photos

Commentary

Travel Features

Links

 
 
Search Query

 

Bookmark Polo's Bastards

Review: Minolta Sweet S

Reviewer: Rob Wood

Always on the lookout for a bargain, I picked up this little SLR on sale in Japan, complete with a couple of Tamron Lenses as well as the rest of the standard offering in any "kit." The carry case, tripod and other paraphernalia left a lot to be desired, but I wasn't expecting much at the US$370 price tag. It was the SLR and the lenses that were the make or break factors of this deal, and while I wouldn't recommend either these lenses or this SLR for traveling the third world or taking action shots, the purchase has not been a complete loss.

Firstly the lenses: The Tamron AF 28-80 lens is not my favourite for uncontrolled shooting environments. With a minimum aperture setting of f3.5, the depth of field control is not as good as most Canon or Nikon lenses of the same size. Like most photographers, I like to really open up the lens. Being unable to open the lens that little bit more really restricts you in cramped environments and leaves the photos looking a little flat. The auto-focus feature is also not particularly fast and is exceptionally noisy - both are traits that would be major drawbacks for shooting in the third-world - especially if shooting people. If that little extra ability to open the aperture and AF speed are minor considerations then the Tamron AF 28-80 has several excellent features that could benefit the world traveler. If keeping the weight down in your pack is a big priority (as it usually is) then this lens is as light as they come at only 237 grams. The other great thing about this lens is the price tag. While I got mine in a package, it is easy enough to find it online for around the US $100 mark.

- Probably a 2 out of 5 rating for this one.


The big brother is the Tamron AF 75-300, which has many of the same benefits and drawbacks. The minimum aperture setting is f4, again restricting that ever-important control over depth of field. The auto-focus is painfully slow and noisy, meaning that if you are trying to take a candid shot of a person, you may both alert them to your intention when they hear the lens, and lose the shot too! This has happened to me several times with this lens. However, a lens this big really allows you to get up close and personal with your subjects from a distance, so the noise complaint can be avoided. Again it is also super light at only 435 grams and super cheap at around the US $150 mark.

- I like this one a little better so I give it a 2.5 out of 5.

Onto the Minolta Sweet SLR: This camera is a reasonable lower-end buy. It has many of the standard SLR features with a fully automatic mode that allows for various settings such as portrait, landscape, action, etc. It also has a handy function that allows you to move straight to fully automatic mode with the press of one handily placed button. It has the standard built-in flash with a mount for a more serious flash if the need should arise (which I imagine it would if you liked flash photography).

While it has most of the standard features of most SLR cameras, I do have one major complaint. This camera is complicated. Excluding the aforementioned button for fully auto mode as well as the lens speed, the controls are not very intuitive at all. Changing the aperture setting requires you to hold one button with your left thumb in a very awkward position, while toggling the speed control with your right forefinger, again in an uncomfortable position (maybe I just have big hands?). The button to invoke the auto-focus is also in a very inconvenient position, generally requiring the photographer to take his eye away from the viewfinder in order to find it. Once again, if speed is an issue for you, then you may not want to go with this SLR for these reasons.

- 2 out of 5.

Overall however, if the price and weight are two big factors, as they always are for travel with a pack, then it is hard to complain. If you want to take predominantly landscape and stills, then this camera and the lenses will be everything you need. If people and action shots are your main shooting priorities, then you will be left disappointed.

Author: Rob Wood
Contact: news@polosbastards.com

 

Home | About Us | Forum | Reviews | Photos | Commentary | Travel Features | Links

Latest Stories

Travel Features

Reviews

Commentary

Photos

Photo: William B. Plowman

 

Write for Us

Polo's Bastards is always looking for new stories. Send your contribution to our editor.

The Latest Spin

 

www.polosbastards.com

Sign into Bastard Mail

 
   
 

Disclaimer

The views expressed on this website are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of, nor are endorsed by, the publishers of this website. The material on this website is for background interest only and the publishers and authors assume no liability for actions undertaken on the basis of the material.

This material is not to be reproduced or transmitted without the written permission of the authors.